No 27 CROW LANE
THIS HOUSE HAS A VERY SURPRISING HISTORY
(see also The Wolstenholme family history)
DATE OF BUILD - Before 1842
Detached stone house, originally with a stone roof
Symetrical with the front door in the middle
You will find a drawing of this house in the file of drawings by John B Taylor & a photo in the catalogue
UNUSUAL FEATURES
1) Unlike most double-fronted houses, no. 27 has only 2 ground-floor rooms 2 bedrooms and bathroom on the 1st floor.
2) Stone staircase (internal) Immediately ahead as you go in through the front door Runs up between the 2 downstairs rooms.
3) High walled side yard with a gate next to the ginnel
THERE SEEMS TO BE NO MYSTERY HERE !
HOWEVER Nos. 27 WAS INEXTRICABLY LINKED TO Nos. 29 & 31
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO NOS. 29 & 31 CROW LANE
Nos. 29 & 31 ARE MISSING - THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF THEM NOW
HOW MANY HOUSES ARE MISSING ? During the Victorian period & early 20th Cent. there was always ONE dwelling between no.27 and no.33.
Normally numbered no. 31
Only 1891 census numbered it 29 - and then 31 was not included
CONCLUSION - THERE WAS ONLY ONE HOUSE
WHERE WAS NO. 31 ? Between No. 27 and no. 33 there is a small yard
POSSIBLE CONCLUSION
No. 27 Large double fronted house No. 31 Small dwelling where the yard is now.
HOWEVER ….. THIS DOES NOT FIT THE FACTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Nos.
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN 27 & 31 ?
EVIDENCE FROM RATES VALUAUTION
1910 RATES VALUATION No 27 rates £ 5 No. 31 rates £ 5
These rates were equal and were very low - much less than other houses
eg No.s 33 - 43 rates £ 7 :10 for each house These are smaller cottages than no.27
EVIDENCE FROM CENSUES
1891 CENSUS & 1901 CENSUS Both no. 27 and no. 31 were two roomed dwellings
EVIDENCE FROM MAPS
MAP dated 1892 No. 27 is two equal sized houses with the partly covered yard on the right
POSSIBLE CONCLUSION
Even though it looks like a normal double-fronted house, perhaps ……
The current house was once ….. Two 2-roomed dwellings nos.27 & 31.
WHY WERE THEY NUMBERED 27 & 31 NOT 27 & 29 ?
If they were two parts of the same house you would expect them to be nos. 27 & 29
Perhaps no 31 was normally entered through the yard the door to which lies nearer to no.33 than it does to no. 27
******************************************
MAPS, CENSUES AND RATE VALUATIONS SUGGEST
NO. 27 WAS TWO "ONE-UP ONE-DOWN HOUSES"
IS THERE CORROBORATING EVIDENCE. ?
EYE WITNESS EVIDENCE
27 was "one-up one-down"
Evidence comes from the Great-granddaughter of Robert Wolstenholme who lived in the house in 1861 and whose granddaughter lived there until the early 1940's.
Having been traced through the Crow Lane Project, Gladys Kaine (nee Wolstenholme) visited the house in March 2003
Gladys used to visit her aunt at no. 27 until the early 1940s. She remembers the house as a "one-up one-down"
No 27 was on the left of the front door.
DOWNSTAIRS - one room which contained fireplace slopstone sink behind the door built-in cupboard (still existing)
UPSTAIRS - one bedroom they all slept in the same bed. No bathroom or toilet
FRONT DOOR , BUT NO BACK DOOR
OUTSIDE TOILET ONLY How did they get to the toilet ?
Out of the front door, In through the gate in the walled yard
There were two toilets, presumably one for each dwelling